Search blog.co.uk

A Musing

by chassy @ 2008-05-17 - 18:26:13

Matter is sacred, existence holy.

We exist in many different states at many different times

but in whatever state we are, we still are, and with that that we are,

we choose, in a synchronously interconnected multi-dimensional reality,

with which we interact.

Question your thoughts, motives and behaviour.


 
 

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

SeasideManSeasideMan pro
2008-05-22 @ 00:17

"We are god for only we can create the idea of his existence in our holy brains"

Cheers, Tom.

chassychassy [Member]
2008-05-22 @ 11:02

I'd go as far as saying we are part of God. I wouldn't like to assume whether beings other than humans have an idea of the existence of God or not, they could be living in full awareness of God for all we know whilst we think it's an idea we've come up with.

Regards, Elaine.

SeasideManSeasideMan pro
2008-05-22 @ 11:46

The idea of god is a human invention. Animals might have invented it too, but that seems unlikely as most of them measurably don't have sufficient intelligence for such abstract thinking.

Cheers, Tom.

chassychassy [Member]
2008-05-22 @ 13:37

Do you not think it possible that there are other beings in this Universe, besides humans and other animals, who could have similar concepts?

Have you seen the two monkeys, separated by glass, one with a jar containing two treats, the other with the tool to open the jar? A hole allowed the tool to be passed through, the monkey used the tool then passed back a treat. Now, they could have been trained and the demonstration a ploy for more funding. Same goes for a couple of crows who had to pull a tray into the cage by strings, together, otherwise the string would pull through. There's also a Jack Russell who can do basic maths, harder to account for that one, and there are examples of animals warning people of danger ahead etc, recently I read of some-one held by an orang-utan until daylight, it turned out a large crocodile was on the path further ahead. It often seems animals are less animalistic in behaviour than many humans, and more rational come to that, avoiding things they know are harmful to themselves. The fact most of them may not display sufficient intelligence suggests some do, can a lack of display of intelligence among the many be accepted as proof of insufficient intelligence for abstract thought in the species? Where does that leave the human race at present? I don't know if the presence of abstract thought has been monitored, but consciousness is still very much a topic of discussion, out-of-body experiences proof, at least to those who've experienced it, that we can exist consciously outside of our bodies. Science recognises 'new' aspects regularly, there's still plenty more yet to uncover.

Cheers, Elaine.

ps. thanks for dropping in too, meant to put that on the last reply.

SeasideManSeasideMan pro
2008-05-22 @ 14:12

It’s perfectly possible that there are other beings elsewhere in the universe as smart as humans, but there is currently no evidence for their existence at all.

But there is evidence that some earth animals have the ability to think abstractly to some degree, and these include chimps, gorillas, orang-utans, pigs, elephants, dolphins and a few others. Dogs are generally thought to have insufficiently large and insufficiently complex brains for it. The ability to solve simple problems is not the same as abstraction.

But the leap from limited ability to think abstractly to the supposition that animals ponder the nature of existence and how they came to be seems unjustifiable to me.

“out-of-body experiences” could just be particularly vivid dreams.

If you choose to believe that animals can do this, that’s up to you. But as for the existence of god, there is no supporting evidence, merely faith.

-------

I like thinking about these things so it was nice that you raised the issues.

Cheers, Tom.

chassychassy [Member]
2008-05-23 @ 11:40

It’s perfectly possible that there are other beings elsewhere in the universe as smart as humans, but there is currently no evidence for their existence at all.

… Many things once denied of existence or not known to exist, are found to exist once perceived.

But there is evidence that some earth animals have the ability to think abstractly to some degree, and these include chimps, gorillas, orang-utans, pigs, elephants, dolphins and a few others. Dogs are generally thought to have insufficiently large and insufficiently complex brains for it. The ability to solve simple problems is not the same as abstraction.

…I beg to differ here. I would say manipulation of numbers is abstract thought.

But the leap from limited ability to think abstractly to the supposition that animals ponder the nature of existence and how they came to be seems unjustifiable to me

… I wasn’t suggesting animals ponder the nature of existence :)) or are aware of God, just that I’ve experienced enough to know there’s a lot more goes on that we’re not aware of than I could have imagined. I was also saying God may have always been, and may be perceived by much that we have not yet perceived, in ways we may not yet be aware of, but because humans create frameworks within which to fit God, it could appear to be a human invention, like leaves capturing water, and man thinking he’d invented the cup.

“out-of-body experiences” could just be particularly vivid dreams.

… There’s quite a bit of evidence regarding OBE’s and NDE’s. I have had one clear experience of it and have known a few who have also experienced it. Some practice astral projection, most I've come across seem to have experienced it spontaneously. There are books to learn how to do it. Test it!

If you choose to believe that animals can do this, that’s up to you. But as for the existence of god, there is no supporting evidence, merely faith.

… For an individual an experience of God would probably be proof enough, faith would probably result, and evidence would likely be seen in existence. It could also possibly be visible for others by way of the individual. If, after witnessing an effect, scientists believe in the existence of something previously undetected, they will go to great lengths to prove its existence. If they don't believe in something, they're unlikely to be looking for it.

I really like discussing things like this because I believe others’ views help develop one’s own perception of what is by re-examination, so thanks for engaging with me.

Cheers, Elaine.

SeasideManSeasideMan pro
2008-05-23 @ 14:11

A complete absence of evidence doesn't disprove life elsewhere, in fact it is virtually certain statistically that there is life elsewhere. Our chance of meting it though, is very close to zero.

I've seen elephants doing paintings, and I've seen horses apparently adding up numbers. But, I have never seen it demonstrated that they could do this without an awful lot of very specific teaching and it is unclear if they can do it without clues from their masters. Dogs and horses are both brilliant at observing human body language, for example.

There is a great deal of evidence now that psychotic mental episodes lead to belief in god. There is no way of telling whether a personal experience of this sort actually was "god" or merely a temporary brain problem.

If you have some hard evidence for astral projection, I'd love to see it.

Cheers, Tom.

chassychassy [Member]
2008-05-24 @ 15:39

A complete absence of evidence doesn't disprove life elsewhere, in fact it is virtually certain statistically that there is life elsewhere. Our chance of meting it though, is very close to zero.

… yet the complete absence of evidence appears to be enough to disprove God, when in fact those who’ve experienced it see evidence everywhere, and may well believe the chance of meeting God is 100%.

I've seen elephants doing paintings, and I've seen horses apparently adding up numbers. But, I have never seen it demonstrated that they could do this without an awful lot of very specific teaching and it is unclear if they can do it without clues from their masters. Dogs and horses are both brilliant at observing human body language, for example.

… I never thought of that. Thanks. Without knowing the full experiment, I don’t know if the same answer via different routes was tested to see if the human was indicating the answer. I’ll have to keep my mind open on that one, cheers :))

There is a great deal of evidence now that psychotic mental episodes lead to belief in god. There is no way of telling whether a personal experience of this sort actually was "god" or merely a temporary brain problem.

…I take it this isn’t suggesting all psychotic mental episodes lead to belief in God, but is it positing all who’ve experienced God have had temporary brain problems? If so, these brain problems can be practiced, and as the state for the practitioner is as real as any others’ state, the activity in the brain as real as any activity in the brain, by what measure is it a problem, it could be just another aspect of the workings of the brain. Left-handedness used to be considered a problem.

If you have some hard evidence for astral projection, I'd love to see it.

:)) :)) Joking aside!! I can’t be bothered to raise the discipline to practice astral projection nor develop astral vision, but there is documented evidence of tests, one I recall where the subject successfully read something placed out of sight. The CIA and KGB have been recorded as having used the method too. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence but experience may be the best proof, so try it yourself, seriously, what have you to lose?

It’s been fun, cheers, Elaine.

joebanglesjoebangles [Member]
2008-06-05 @ 14:58

Hi Ellie, taken me a wee time to get around to having a look at this post, to be honest I have spent a lot of time in the garden as the weather has been so good up here and it's a bloody big garden and I have many a coffee break sitting watching the flowers grow. Also getting the new group running as it needs as many members as possible to get that wide variety of comments to make it work.

This post of yours has been an interesting read, I like to see anyone fighting their corner over the way they feel about anything and it gives others food for thought even if it does not change their minds.

This subject obviously has folk split in so many different camps with their own ideas, if their way of thinking suits them, that's great.

There are too many reasons why I do not believe in a God but I am happy for those that do, anything that give a peace of mind or support must be a good thing.

Keep well Ellie.

chassychassy [Member]
2008-06-06 @ 19:05

Sounds idyllic Trevor, a delightful way to spend time, hope the weather's still holding out for you.

It's been a real brain-workout over on 'ask-or-answer'! Been great fun, well done for setting it up, I think you may have had more comments on 'evidence of God' than expected, hot topic, been good to have somewhere to debate it!

I'm supposed to be doing stuff for eagle-eye's 'play wot we wrote', and some questions for znethru, so I don't know how I happened to come across the post as I've not been here much, but I probably won't be getting into much discussion for a few weeks, the reason at present I'm not joining any groups, but it's good Trevor, so I hope I'll be popping back in again sometime in the future.

Well I hope you are well Trevor, have a good evening/weekend, love and regards,

Ellie.X.

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.